I'm fairly sure that the so-called Mr. Federal Way's identity is no mystery to the higher-ups at Federal Way City Hall, so why doesn't Mayor Ferrell's associates point out exactly who this propagandist is through an aside in a citywide mailer instead of Ferrell's communications man indirectly referring to the sleaze-ball through a comment on "Fetchit's" own column? Ferrell's aide said, in so many words, that "Mr. Federal Way's" recent column about the mayor and his policies was sleaze, although he put it in much nicer terms than that. Sleaze and "Mr. Federal Way," a.k.a. "Fetchit," is nothing new, of course (even many non-fans of Ferrell like me can agree on that), but I wonder how long it will take the Mirror to delete the criticism of their anonymous writer by the mayor's aide and others as they did to mine about "Rogue-ner" some time ago. Not long, I suspect, which would be par for the course regarding the underhanded dealings at that newspaper.
Perhaps, I have it wrong about the anonymous man's or woman's identity in my last post (deleted since late summer or fall of '16) and they have me and a good portion of Federal Way fooled. Could it be that they don't want to let us know the identity, because the real writer might be 180 degrees different in style and physical appearance from the caricature above the column? Could we have a little scandal in the making that would really embarrass the Mirror, and in their effort to prevent that from occurring, they are not about to upset the apple cart by revealing "Mr. Federal Way's" identity?
Whatever the case may be about who the real Mr. Federal Way is, it's a shame that some let propagandists at the Mirror, primarily "Rogue-ner" and "Fetchit," bamboozle them into believing that I wasn't qualified to be on the Council, effectively stealing votes and inserting their own preferred candidate onto the Council. Whatever the made-up controversy about my qualifications has wrought, I am qualified enough to keep the Position 1 election in doubt, by holding it up to the eyes of a federal court, with a senior judge assigned to my case and that judge scheduling a status conference next spring, and I accomplished this without the benefit of a lawyer, myself.
[Revised on 2/1/16. Added phrase about deletion of "last post" on 12/2/16.]
Perhaps, I have it wrong about the anonymous man's or woman's identity in my last post (deleted since late summer or fall of '16) and they have me and a good portion of Federal Way fooled. Could it be that they don't want to let us know the identity, because the real writer might be 180 degrees different in style and physical appearance from the caricature above the column? Could we have a little scandal in the making that would really embarrass the Mirror, and in their effort to prevent that from occurring, they are not about to upset the apple cart by revealing "Mr. Federal Way's" identity?
Whatever the case may be about who the real Mr. Federal Way is, it's a shame that some let propagandists at the Mirror, primarily "Rogue-ner" and "Fetchit," bamboozle them into believing that I wasn't qualified to be on the Council, effectively stealing votes and inserting their own preferred candidate onto the Council. Whatever the made-up controversy about my qualifications has wrought, I am qualified enough to keep the Position 1 election in doubt, by holding it up to the eyes of a federal court, with a senior judge assigned to my case and that judge scheduling a status conference next spring, and I accomplished this without the benefit of a lawyer, myself.
[Revised on 2/1/16. Added phrase about deletion of "last post" on 12/2/16.]
Comments